yes or no website logo?

[pattyhm73]

what do u guys think? im working on my website logo
should i go for any of these or work on a diferent one
opinions anyone? :undecided:


http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e147/pattyhm73/logo11.jpg


OR


http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e147/pattyhm73/logo111.jpg



thnx :love:

[Silverstangs]

The image looks busy and it's kind of difficult at first glance to figure out what I was looking at. The wording with the mirrored effect is something I like, but I would loose the baby blue color on then end. .

[DigitalScape]

I like the reflection, but I had the same difficutly as Scott at initially determining what was the name. I kind of like the blue color, but it does draw the eye to the dot com portion of the logo - way from the name. Maybe make the Digitalinvision blue or a gradient (blue to the gray dot com).

[pattyhm73]

how about this? or should i just loose the picture


http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e147/pattyhm73/logo22.jpg

ok im gunna work on a different text

[DigitalScape]

I think that you may want to drop the picture. For me, it takes some looking at it to see/understand what the image is. Dropping the picture will allow you to use a larger text font.

[pattyhm73]

i dont want it to look simple with the text only, i want people to know what digitalinvision is, there has to be an image related to photography

[DigitalScape]

Patty, I understand and agree that you want the immediate tie to photography. To me the image you have does not immediately make that connection - when I first saw the image, I had to really look at it to see the camera. It could also be my eyes and/or monitor (or not enough coffee).

[pattyhm73]

Patty, I understand and agree that you want the immediate tie to photography. To me the image you have does not immediately make that connection - when I first saw the image, I had to really look at it to see the camera. It could also be my eyes and/or monitor (or not enough coffee).



well it is dark, i'll take another pic where the shadow is not hitting the camera.

or u might need more coffee and see the eye Dr. lol :evilnyah:

[Hikin' Mike]

It looks like DIGITA Linvision to me. I would break the two words into two colors, maybe blue/gray/blue DIGITALinvision.com something like that. Although I'm not really 'feeling' the cap/lowercase in this case. I would lose the last version...with the embossing.

EDIT: One more thing...If you're going to use a photo as part of your logo, can you print that on a t-shirt? Probably not. You might consider either removing the photo or design a logo without a photo as a graphic.

[pattyhm73]

i like the idea of breaking the colors, Hmm im doing that tonite, i have a logo
it's just a rough draft, my friend made it 2yrs ago

http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e147/pattyhm73/di-1.jpg

[Hikin' Mike]

i like the idea of breaking the colors, Hmm im doing that tonite, i have a logo
it's just a rough draft, my friend made it 2yrs ago


I like that graphic better than the 'photo'!

[Silverstangs]

i like the idea of breaking the colors, Hmm im doing that tonite, i have a logo
it's just a rough draft, my friend made it 2yrs ago

http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e147/pattyhm73/di-1.jpg



Much better than the foto.

[pattyhm73]

thnx guys :love: :love: :love:

[DigitalScape]

That's a nice logo!

[Killjoy]

I have to agree. I like the logo.

[pattyhm73]

the background of the page is black




http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e147/pattyhm73/digiblk.jpg




or



http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e147/pattyhm73/digigray.jpg


or neither

actually those gaps around the logo arent suppose to be there lol

i just notice the text shadow is to dark on the gray one

[DigitalScape]

I like the second one better - more of the reflection is seen.

[Hikin' Mike]

Neither. I don't care for the reflection. It's too distracting.

[pattyhm73]

Neither. I don't care for the reflection. It's too distracting.

thnx mike i appreaciate ur honesty

[ARSchmidt]

at one point you stated, "i want people to know what digitalinvision is, there has to be an image related to photography" then came up with a logo that, while appealing, doesn't seem to convey that. going back to your original concept with the photo, why can't it just be a camera rather than someone using a camera? as for the text, digital is pretty clear, but what does "invision" mean (just looking at it as words)? is it a misspelling of invasion (sorry, just gotta go there)? perhaps the segregation of words would be clearer - digital in vision - if you were to increase the font size of the 'v' just a bit.

[Lilikoi the cat]

I prefer the last grey one but with larger font.
This is only because it reminds me of NW coast Indian art, which I happen to really like.